Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 145194

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : December | Volume : 17 | Issue : 12 | Page : ED08 - ED11 Full Version

Upper Labial Mucosa Schwannoma: A Rare Case Report


Published: December 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/67669.18801
Roopa Yadahalli

1. Associate Professor, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Roopa Yadahalli,
Associate Professor, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pimpri, Pune-411018, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: roopa.madalli@gmail.com

Abstract

An upper lip swelling, asymptomatic, and benign-looking lesion may be attributed to numerous aetiologies. About 25% to 45% of Schwannomas/Neurilemmomas occur in the head and neck region and are seldom seen in oral sites, accounting form only 1% of cases. Herein, the authors presented a case report of a 36-year-old female patient with a clinical appearance of upper labial mucosa swelling is mentioned, which mimicked a mucocele. It was a single, smooth, oval, fluctuant, and non tender swelling. Complete surgical excision was performed following proper protocol, and histological diagnosis revealed a well-outlined lesion enclosed within a fibrous capsule. The connective tissue mass of the tumour consisted predominantly of neural tissue arranged in Antoni A structures, characterised by a palisaded nuclear arrangement and the presence of distinctive eosinophilic Verocay bodies. Another area with a myxoid appearance, representing Antoni B structure, was also present, suggesting a Schwannoma/Neurilemmoma. During follow-up, complete healing with no recurrence of swelling was observed. Schwannomas/Neurilemmomas in the head and neck region are less common, particularly in the oral cavity. According to various studies, the occurrence of neurilemmomas in the intraoral aspect accounts for only 19.24% of cases, specifically involving the mucosa of the lip. Practitioners should consider this rare entity of Schwannoma/Neurilemmoma when evaluating an upper lip swelling routinely.

Keywords

Immunohistochemistry, Neurilemmoma, Upper lip swelling, Verocay bodies

Case Report

A 36-year-old female patient reported to the Outpatients Department (OPD) of Oral Medicine and Radiology with a chief complaint of painless swelling inside her mouth on the right-side of the upper lip. The swelling had been presented for two months. The patient’s medical history was unremarkable. Upon examination, no noticeable facial asymmetry was observed, but the patient did experience slight discomfort during normal functions. Intraoral examination revealed a 5x8 mm ill-defined, smooth-surfaced lesion without ulceration, located near the right maxillary central and lateral incisors. The swelling appeared oval in shape and was non pedunculated. Palpation of the swelling revealed it to be non tender, nodular, and fluctuant, with no blanching when the upper lip was stretched (Table/Fig 1)a. A provisional diagnosis of mucocele was made based on the small size, fluctuant nature, and location of the lesion. Routine blood investigations were performed before the surgery, and the results were within normal limits. Excisional biopsy was performed under local anaesthesia with all necessary aseptic precautions. The swelling was completely removed and sent for histological staining and examination. Gross pathology revealed an oval-shaped, whitish lesion with a soft consistency (Table/Fig 1)b.

Histopathological investigation using Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining demonstrated a well-outlined lesion enclosed within a fibrous capsule. The connective tissue mass of the tumour consisted predominantly of neural tissue arranged in Antoni A structures (Table/Fig 2)a,b, characterised by a striking palisaded nuclear arrangement and the presence of distinctive eosinophilic Verocay bodies. Another area with a myxoid appearance, representing Antoni B structures, was also present. Areas of blood vessels with thrombus formation could be seen interspersed throughout the tumour mass. Based on these features, the diagnosis was schwannoma or neurilemmoma of the upper lip.

There was no requirement for Immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers to be used in the present case. During follow-up, complete healing was observed with no recurrence of swelling.

Discussion

Schwannomas or neurilemmomas are uncommon tumours that predominantly originate from peripheral nerves, specifically the perineural Schwann cells. They can occur in any type of nerve, including somatic or sympathetic nerves, and are typically found in deeper soft tissues (1). These tumours are also referred to as neurilemmomas, neurinomas, or perineural fibroblastomas (1). They often develop in the head and neck region due to the specific anatomy of this area, with the parapharyngeal space of the neck being the most common location (2). Schwann cells, which envelop neurons and their axons, are usually affected by these tumours, involving the peripheral, cranial (except the optic and olfactory), spinal, and autonomic nervous systems (2). While no known predisposing factors exist, it is believed that trauma may be a contributing cause. Recent studies suggest that a defect in the merlin protein may be responsible for both sporadic and genetic schwannomas (2). Approximately 25% to 45% of schwannomas occur in the head and neck region, and they are rarely seen in oral sites, accounting for only 1% of reported cases (1). According to various studies, neurilemmomas in the intraoral aspect occur in the lip mucosa in just 19.24% of cases (3). The present case report described a rare case of schwannoma in the head and neck region, specifically in the upper lip, where the specimen was initially diagnosed as a mucocele.

A literature search from 1966 to 2002 revealed only six documented cases of schwannoma of the upper lip (4). A recent PubMed search within the last 10 years identified an additional four cases of upper lip schwannomas. Krishnan B et al., reported a case of upper lip swelling in a 28-year-old female patient that resembled an adenoma but was histologically diagnosed as a schwannoma. However, the present case involved the extraoral surface of the lip on keratinised mucosa, in contrast to the present case which involved the intraoral surface on non keratinised mucosa (5). Hajong R et al., presented a case of a 14-year-old female patient with a swelling on the extraoral surface of the upper lip, initially clinically diagnosed as a lipoma but later confirmed as a schwannoma (6). The present case also presented on the extraoral surface of the labial mucosa with a firm consistency, similar to the findings reported by Krishnan B et al., (5). Haigh T et al., reported a similar case in a 23-year-old female patient with a small upper lip swelling, initially clinically diagnosed as a mucocele (7). Desai J reported a paediatric case of a 14-year-old male patient with a differential diagnosis of traumatic fibroma, labial minor salivary gland tumour, or swelling secondary to trauma. The lesion was located in the intraoral part of the upper lip and had a moderately hard consistency (8). However, the age group of these two cases did not match the present case. Another case involved a 16-year-old male patient with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) who presented with a tumour-like lesion on the upper lip, clinically diagnosed as a neurofibroma. The patient had multiple café-au-lait spots on the entire body and ephelides on the face. Surgical resection of congenital melanocytic nevi on the back and thigh was performed, and histopathological examination revealed a Wagner-Meissner neurilemmoma (9). Humber CC et al., reported a case of an 82-year-old woman with a long-standing firm swelling on the upper lip. The patient experienced intermittent mild paresthesia in the region, and clinically, the lesion was suggestive of a benign mesenchymal origin (10). In comparison to the present case, the swelling was firm, and the presence of paresthesia was noted, making it the oldest case reported.

Clinically, benign schwannomas are slowly progressing, encapsulated nodular lesions that are typically solitary. In general, they are symptomless, although pain and paresthesia may occur. As they grow, the lesions can displace adjacent nerves (10). The clinical symptoms of schwannomas vary depending on the origin of the nerve. Schwannomas can be found spontaneously or in conjunction with familial tumours and syndromes such as NF2, schwannomatosis, and Carney’s complex (2). Schwannomas can occur in individuals of all age groups, but they are most common in the third and fourth decades of life. Various studies have reported different rates of sex predilection, although most indicate an equal sex distribution. Schwannomas are typically not attached to deep tissues and are freely mobile, although movement may be restricted when they are adjacent to a large nerve or trunk (10). Clinically, differential diagnosis can include other benign lesions such as fibroma, lipoma, neurofibroma, salivary gland tumours, certain dermal cysts, and even lymphatic origin tumours. However, histologically, schwannomas can be differentiated from other neural lineage lesions like neurofibromas and neuromas, as well as tumours of muscular or fibroblastic origin (11).

Radiological examinations such as a Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) scan and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are required to assess the extent of the tumour and for histopathological diagnosis. Treatment typically involves surgical excision of the lesion, which has a low but rare recurrence rate. The potential transformation of a benign schwannoma of the oral cavity into malignancy is still a subject of debate but remains a concern (11).

Gross pathology of schwannomas typically reveals smooth, nodular ovals with occasional visibility of the nerve of origin. The cut surface of the tumour appears tan or yellow. Histologically, schwannomas exhibit well-encapsulated lesions with areas composed of fascicles of spindle-shaped Schwann cells (referred to as Antoni A pattern). These areas may merge with or transition to more loosely arranged areas with microcysts (referred to as Antoni B pattern). A common feature of schwannomas is the presence of palisading nuclei, forming parallel nuclear arrays known as Verocay bodies, although this feature is not observed in vestibular area lesions (12). Large tumours often demonstrate extensive degenerative changes, including thick hyalinisation, thrombosis, ectatic blood vessels, haemorrhagic areas, lipidisation, calcification, and cystic changes. These vascular changes may lead to infarct-like areas of necrosis (12). Tumours with such extensive degenerative changes are referred to as “ancient schwannomas” and may exhibit nuclear atypia, often leading to misdiagnosis as malignant lesions. Mast cells are rare components of schwannomas but are commonly found in neurofibromas and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumours (MPNSTs). Schwannomas may also exhibit areas with an epithelioid morphology (13). The histological variants of neurilemmoma include conventional, cellular, plexiform, and melanotic variants. The most common variant is the conventional schwannoma, while large, old tumours exhibiting nuclear atypia are classified as ancient schwannomas, which is a subvariant of conventional schwannoma (13).

While the conventional H&E stain is considered the gold standard for pathology diagnosis, IHC plays a crucial role in surgical pathology. IHC is a more precise method that can further distinguish between morphologically similar findings on H&E stain by utilising specific markers. This not only aids in the interpretation of a precise diagnosis based on the cell of origin but also helps in selecting appropriate therapy for each individual case. Therefore, IHC has become an integral part of the diagnostic armamentarium in neuropathology. (Table/Fig 3) presents the IHC markers that have been studied thus far to differentiate between different variants of schwannoma, such as cellular, plexiform, and melanotic types (2),(3),(13),(14),(15),(16). (Table/Fig 4) provides insights into the IHC markers relevant to the differential diagnosis of schwannomas from other neural origin lesions, neurofibromas, perineuromas, and MPNSTs (14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22),(23),(24),(25),(26). Finally, (Table/Fig 5) summarises previously reported cases of neurilemmomas since the year 2000 (4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9),(10).

Conclusion

Benign schwannomas are a pathology that is often overlooked in clinical practice. Differential diagnosis must be considered in conjunction with numerous benign neoplasms originating from epithelial and connective tissues, as well as malignant tumours. Immunohistochemical characteristics can be helpful in determining neural differentiation, and the intensity of staining can serve as an essential diagnostic tool.

References

1.
Thurnher D, Quint C, Pammer J, Schima W, Knerer B, Denk DM. Dysphagia due to a large schwannoma of the oropharynx: Case report and review of the literature. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(7):850-52. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Hilton DA, Hanemann CO. Schwannomas and their pathogenesis. Brain Pathol. 2014;24(3):205-20. Doi: 10.1111/bpa.12125. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Ravindran C, Siroraj P, Deepak C, Narasimhan M. Intraoral neurilemmoma of mental nerve mimicking as traumatic fibroma: An unusual presentation- A case report and literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017;21(1):124-28. Doi: 10.4103/0973-029X.203770. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Yang SW, Lin CY. Schwannoma of the upper lip: Case reportand literature review. American Journal of Otolaryngology. 2003;24(5):351-54. Doi: 10.1016/S0196-0709(03)00065-6. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Krishnan B, Basu D, Daniel JM. A discrete swelling of the upper lip: A diagnostic and clinical stepladder. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2014;13(3):300-04. Doi: 10.1007/s12663-013-0531-6. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Hajong R, Hajong D, Naku N, Sharma G, Boruah M. Schwannoma of upper lip: Report of a rare case in a rare age group. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(8):PD10-PD11. Doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/20888.8395. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Haigh T, Glore JR, Gouldesbrough D, Wong W. A lip lump: An unexpected histological diagnosis of a lip schwannoma. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2017;2017:3107362. Doi: 10.1155/2017/3107362. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Desai J. An unexpected and rare outcome of a common nodular mass on upper lip in a pediatric patient with a history of trauma- Schwannoma. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2019;10(1):102-04. Doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_48_18. PMID: 31205398; PMCID: PMC6563628.[crossref][PubMed]
9.
Miyasaka C, Ishida M, Kouchi Y, Morimoto N, Kusumoto K, Okabe H, et al. Wagner-Meissner neurilemmoma of the lip occurring in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol. 2020;12(1):41-43. Doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1944. [crossref]
10.
Humber CC, Copete MA, Hohn FI. Ancient schwannoma of upper lip: Case report with distinct histologic features and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(6):e118-22. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Singh HP, Kumar S, Verma N, Vashistha M, Chaddha A, Agarwal SP, et al. Schwannoma base of tongue: Report of a rare case and review of literature. Int J Head Neck Surg. 2013;4(3):133-35. [crossref]
12.
Baliga M, Uppal N, Ramanathan A. Schwannomas of the head and neck: A case series. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2009;8(3):283-86. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Kurtkaya-Yapicier O, Scheithauer B, Woodruff JM. The pathobiologic spectrum of Schwannomas. Histol Histopathol. 2003;18(3):925-34.
14.
Wu CC, Pan MR, Wei YC, Lin CH, Yang SF, Tsai HP, et al. CHD4 as a potential biomarker in differentiating between cellular schwannoma and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2018;26(10):775-80. Doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000522. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Guo A, Liu A, Wei L, Song X. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours: Differentiation patterns and immunohistochemical features- a mini-review and our new findings. J Cancer. 2012;3:303-09. Doi: 10.7150/jca.4179. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Zhang HY, Yang GH, Chen HJ, Wei B, Ke Q, Guo H, et al. Clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study of 13 cases of melanotic schwannoma. Chin Med J (Engl) 2005;118(17):1451-61.
17.
Karamchandani JR, Nielsen TO, van de Rijn M, West RB. Sox10 and S100 in the diagnosis of soft-tissue neoplasms. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2012;20(05):445-50. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Fine SW, McClain SA, Li M. Immunohistochemical staining for calretinin is useful for differentiating schwannomas from neurofibromas. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122(04):552-59. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Nonaka D, Chiriboga L, Rubin BP. Sox10: A pan-schwannian and melanocytic marker. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(09):1291-98. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Kurihara J, Yokoo S, Ichikawa M, Shimizu T, Ogawa M, Seki M. Intraosseous intraneural perineurioma derived from the inferior alveolar nerve with an abnormality of chromosome 22 and expression of the BCR-ABL fusion gene: Report of a case and review of recent literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):189. Doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1481-8. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Thway K, Fisher C. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour: Pathology and genetics. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2014;18(02):109-16. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Torres-Mora J, Dry S, Li X, Binder S, Amin M, Folpe AL. Malignant melanotic schwannian tumour: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and gene expression profiling study of 40 cases, with a proposal for the reclassification of “melanotic schwannoma”. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38(1):94-105. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Miettinen M. Immunohistochemistry of soft tissue tumours-review with emphasis on 10 markers. Histopathology. 2014;64(01):101-18. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Naber U, Friedrich RE, Glatzel M, Mautner VF, Hagel C. Podoplanin and CD34 in peripheral nerve sheath tumours: Focus on neurofibromatosis 1-associated atypical neurofibroma. J Neurooncol. 2011;103(02):239-45. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Campbell LK, Thomas JR, Lamps LW, Smoller BR, Folpe AL. Protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5) is not a specific marker of neural and nerve sheath tumours: An immunohistochemical study of 95 mesenchymal neoplasms. Mod Pathol. 2003;16(10):963-69. Doi: 10.1097/01.MP.0000087088.88280.B0. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Pekmezci M, Reuss DE, Hirbe AC, Dahiya S, Gutmann DH, von Deimling A, et al. Morphologic and immunohistochemical features of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours and cellular schwannomas. Mod Pathol. 2015;28(02):187-200.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/67669.18801

Date of Submission: Sep 23, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Oct 11, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Nov 08, 2023
Date of Publishing: Dec 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 24, 2023
• Manual Googling: Nov 03, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Nov 06, 2023 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com